Legal Opinion

Vonchina v. Estate of Turner

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1957No. Civ. 22264PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Action on a creditor’s claim presented to the administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of Mabel L. Turner, deceased, and rejected. The claim, in the amount of $5,265, is for alleged services as day and night watchman, caretaker, and gardener from December 1, 1950, to June 1, 1953, at an agreed wage of $40 a week; and for the purchase price of a sleeping cot. 1

The court found: 1. About December 1, 1950 Mabel L. Turner engaged plaintiff to perform services as night watchman, caretaker, and gardener on the basis of an agreed wage of $40 a week. 2. In that capacity plaintiff…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Estate of Bright v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Corato v. Estate of CoratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Figueroa Vda. de Delgado v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1971
  2. Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Estate of Schoeller v. BeckerConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
  4. Corso v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Figueroa Widow of Delgado v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API