Legal Opinion
Marie A. Houston v. National General Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1987No. 86-1960PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.-2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant insurance company seeking coverage under an automobile insurance policy owned by defendant’s insured, James A. Nelson. The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The London and Edinburgh Insurance Company, Limited, and the Dominion Insurance Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- James R. Baker v. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Dodson v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Armijo v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1990
- National Indemnity Co. v. United States Pollution Control, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
- Stroh Ranch Development, LLC v. Cherry Creek South Metropolitan District No. 2District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.