Legal Opinion

Behler v. Kunde

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1929No. Docket No. 6737PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff commenced an action to secure a decree compelling the specific performance of a contract of partition entered into between plaintiff and defendant Arthur Kunde. The remaining defendants are fictitious persons and upon the opening of the trial the action was dismissed as to these.

The parties hereto, plaintiff' and defendant, on July 31, 1923, purchased certain parcels of land and held and farmed o the same as tenants in common until on or about May 19, 1925. On this last date they agreed to partition the property so held by them and in pursuance of this agreement…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arhart v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ray v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Marson v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Johnston v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Harlow v. Motor Coach Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API