Legal Opinion

Ray v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1963No. Civ. 217PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (R.M.), J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $18,000 and from an order denying a new trial. His motion for reduction of the verdict was also denied. The complaint is for damages for personal injuries. Defendant raised affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of risk.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and disregarding conflicts and contradictions, the facts are as follows:

On June 21, 1960, plaintiff, then 19 years of age, was employed by the National Park Service in Sequoia-Kings…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Allen v. ToledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Pedesky v. BleibergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API