Legal Opinion
Arhart v. Thompson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1948No. File 7040PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GeimsoN, District Judge.
This is an action for specific performance. When it first came before this court it was sent back for further evidence in accordance with § 28-2732 ND Dev Code 1943 and in conformity with the rule laid down in Hettinger County v. Trousdale, 69 ND 505, 288 NW 25. At that time Justice A. Gr. Burr wrote an exhaustive opinion in Arhart v. Thompson, reported ante, 189, 26 NW2d 523, which became the law of the case. The main question raised and on which the court desired additional evidence was with regard to a deed from the defendant Clara Thompson to the defendant Agnes…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- O'Hara v. WattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Creveling v. BantaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Morrill v. EversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Cushing v. LeviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harrington v. HarringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Jorgensen v. CrowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- United Accounts, Incorporated v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Sand v. Red River National Bank & Trust Co. of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.