Legal Opinion

Marson v. Rand

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1951No. Civ. 18689PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a rescission action whereby he sought to recover the purchase price which he had paid for outstanding shares of stock in Cienega Village, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the corporation), which plaintiff purchased from defendant Richard Rand pursuant to a contract of sale dated February 10, 1951.

The action was predicated upon the theory that the stock which defendant Richard Rand sold and transferred to plaintiff was void for the reason that it had been issued in violation of terms of the permit granted by the corporation commissioner, in that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Behler v. KundeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. In re JungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tesseyman v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Murphy v. AblowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Green v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Gillespie v. GillespieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API