Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Motor Coach Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1932No. Docket No. 7246PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

As the result of three actions which arose from allegedly negligent, operation of a motor-bus and a private automobile at an intersection of public thoroughfares, consolidated for the purposes of trial, judgments were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants presented several appeals therefrom upon the same transcript. The instant appeal is from the judgment entered in favor of the-owner and operator of the car last mentioned.

The grounds assigned for reversal consist of an asserted insufficiency of the evidence to warrant findings by the trial court as to negligence of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Burgess v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Uhl v. FertigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Behler v. KundeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. McCarthy v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harlow v. Motor Coach Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Miller v. Motor Coach Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Miller v. Motor Coach Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Miller v. Motor Coach CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Miller v. Motor Coach CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API