Legal Opinion

State v. Wiggins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 857SC393PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred by instructing that the box cutter used in the robbery was a dangerous weapon per se. He argues that whether the weapon was dangerous was for the jury to determine. We disagree.

Since a dangerous weapon is synonymous with a deadly one, cases resolving whether a particular weapon was deadly per se are relevant. State v. Mullen, 47 N.C. App. 667, 668, 267 S.E. 2d 564, 565, disc. rev. denied, 301 N.C. 103, 273 S.E. 2d 308 (1980). A dangerous or deadly weapon “is generally defined as any article, instrument or substance which is likely to produce…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. United States v. Lamar Burns-JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API