Legal Opinion

State v. Joyner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 30, 1985No. 175A84PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The controlling question presented is whether the State’s evidence that the defendant endangered or threatened the life of the victim was sufficient to overcome the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the charge of robbery with firearms or other dangerous weapons (armed robbery). We hold that the evidence was sufficient in this regard and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals finding no error in the defendant’s trial and conviction.

The defendant was tried upon an indictment proper in form for robbery with firearms or other dangerous weapons (armed robbery).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API