Legal Opinion
Jacqueline Lynch v. Masters Security
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2014No. 13-AA-517PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Senior Judge:
Petitioner, Jacqueline Lynch, filed an unemployment compensation claim after she was terminated from employment by Respondent, Masters Security. A District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) claims examiner disqualified her from receiving benefits on the ground that she committed gross misconduct in that she “violated [Masters Security’s] weapons handling policy by leaving her loaded gun in the ladies room unsecured.” Sergeant Lynch filed an appeal with the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”). After finding that Sergeant Lynch had not violated a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Jones v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Morris v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donna Black v. DC Dept. of Human Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Friends of McMillan Park and DC for Reasonable Development v. DC Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- JACQUELINE LYNCH v. MASTERS SECURITYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Luo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025