JACQUELINE LYNCH v. MASTERS SECURITY

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

This unemployment compensation matter is before the court again after a remand order in which we directed the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) to consider, on the existing record, whether respondent Masters Security (the “Employer”) proved the following by a preponderance of the evidence with respect to the conduct that led the Employer to terminate petitioner Jacqueline Lynch from her job as an armed security guard:

[That] leaving her weapon in a publicly accessible plaee[,] ... is the kind of gross negligence that we have equated with intentionality due to…