Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Burley Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1956No. 8333PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondent brought this action to recover damages from appellant for injury to a 1952 crop of potatoes.

Appellant, for a time prior to and during 1952, was a duly incorporated, existing and operating irrigation district under the laws of the State of Idaho.

Respondent during 1952 leased and farmed the NE14 of the SW}4 of Sec. 8, Twp. 11 South, Range 23 E.B.M., in Cassia County. He lived on his own farm situate some distance from the leased land.

A main canal of appellant, designated as H-12, extended in a general north and south direction, and carried irrigation water to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hoosac Tunnel & Wilmington Railroad v. New England Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bramwell v. South Rigby Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Curtis v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Harris v. PRESTON-WHITNEY IRRIGATION COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API