Legal Opinion

Harris v. PRESTON-WHITNEY IRRIGATION COMPANY

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1968No. 10100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Owners of a home adjacent to an irrigation canal brought this action against, the canal’s owner, an irrigation company, for damages allegedly caused by negligence in permitting water to flow into the basement of . their home. The court found: “water flowing in the basement was the result of increased flow in the canal and. seepage through the banks into the basement,” and attributed the situation to the-“fault of” the canal owner. The court awarded damages and granted an injunction against maintaining the canal fCso as to further flood Plaintiff’s basement.” Appeal from that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McCarty v. Boise City Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Milbert v. Carl Carbon, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Albrethson v. Carey Valley Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1947
  5. White v. Coeur D'Alene Big Creek Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Miller v. Ririe Joint School District No. 252Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Balla v. MurphyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Lyon v. CASCADE COMMODITIES CORPORATIONIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API