Bramwell v. South Rigby Canal Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
Appellants Gale and Izetta Bramwell (Bramwells) appeal the district judge’s ruling at the conclusion of a court trial that Respondent South Rigby Canal Company (South Rigby) was not liable for water damages to them property. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1965, Bramwells constructed a bridge over a canal maintained by South Rigby near *650their residence and they have maintained the bridge since that time. The bridge was constructed so the bottom of it was about twelve inches lower than the canal bank. This reduced the clearance between the bottom of the bridge…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Turpen v. GranieriIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Brooks v. LoganIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Williamson v. City of McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Bream v. BenscoterIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. MussellIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- King v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Ransom v. Topaz Marketing, L.P.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.