Legal Opinion

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 2000No. 1990131PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas R. Burnett owns a family farm in rural St. Clair County. In 1990, Burnett entered into a "Finishing Hog Agreement" with Arkansas-California Livestock Company, Inc., a predecessor of Tyson Foods, Inc. ("Tyson"). The contract stated that Burnett was an independent contractor of Tyson, and it provided that he would be responsible for operating and maintaining a hog farm. Tyson would deliver young hogs to Burnett, and he would feed, water, and care for the hogs until they reached market size, at which time Tyson would retrieve the hogs.1

Pursuant to the contract, Tyson supplied all food,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. National Insurance Association v. SockwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ott v. City of MobileDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
  3. Parsons v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. South Alabama Skills Training Consortium v. FordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Arnold v. Guideone Specialty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API