Legal Opinion

National Insurance Association v. Sockwell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 15, 2002No. 1001627PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

National Insurance Association, a defendant in an action in Colbert Circuit Court, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Betty Sockwell. We affirm.

Introduction

Sockwell sued her insurer, National Insurance Association ("National"), alleging that National acted in bad faith in failing to properly evaluate and failing to investigate and ultimately in denying her claim for underinsured-motorist ("UIM") benefits. Sockwell also…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. O'Rear v. B.H.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Harrelson v. R.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Slack v. StreamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API