Legal Opinion
Lisiewski v. Seidel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 15, 2002No. AC 21385PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendants, John A. Seidel and Fred R. Seidel, Jr., appeal from the judgment of the trial court, which resolved this boundary dispute involving property located in the town of Sprague in favor of the plaintiff and also found that the plaintiff held a prescriptive easement over the defendants’ gravel driveway. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff, Chester Lisiewski, owns land to the east of the disputed property and brought this action when the defendants erected a metal gate obstructing his passage over the driveway. On…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lisiewski v. SeidelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Slack v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Zabaneh v. DAN BEARD ASSOCIATES, LLC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- McManus v. RoggiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Brander v. StoddardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.