Hilley v. Blue Ridge Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinbok-Ne, J.
The sole question presented on this appeal is based upon exception by defendant to the ruling of the trial court in overruling its motion for judgment as of nonsuit.
Defendant contends, and we bold properly so, that since the terms of the policy of insurance, and of the release given by plaintiff to Southern Railway Company are in writing, and free from ambiguity, and are in evidence, the ascertainment of their meaning and effect is for the court and not for the jury.
The terms of the condition of the policy relating to subrogation are clear, and speak for themselves. Likewise the terms of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Packham v. German Fire Ins., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Auto Owners' Protective Exchange v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Patton v. Sinclaire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Drake v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Armijo v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. HuntleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Jerry Maiatico v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Galinko v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- National Mutual Insurance v. FincherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.