Legal Opinion

Armijo v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1965No. 7610PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover for damages to his automobile under an insurance policy issued to him by the defendant. The latter appeals from a judgment allowing a recovery of the amount of the policy.

As grounds for reversal of the judgment the appellant has advanced three points, under which he maintains (1) that the insurance policy was void from its inception because obtained by fraudulent misrepresentation, (2) that the appellee failed to join in his action an indispensable party, and (3) that the appellee’s settlement with and release of the estate of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. LammonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hoge v. Farmers Market & Supply Co. of Las Cruces, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Locke v. MurdochNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hilley v. Blue Ridge InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Hyde v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harris v. Illinois-California Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc. v. Newco Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. March v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Motto v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Acquisto v. Joe R. Hahn Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API