Legal Opinion

Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1945PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

As a general rule the trial court has the discretionary power to make new parties, especially when necessary in order that there may be a full and final determination and adjudication of all matters involved in the controversy. G. S., 1-73, 163; Insurance Co. v. Locker, 214 N. C., 1, 197 S. E., 555, and cases cited; Morgan v. Turnage Co., Inc., 213 N. C., 425, 196 S. E., 307; Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N. C., 197, 185 S. E., 767; Goins v. Sargent, 196 N. C., 478, 146 S. E., 131.

Ordinarily such orders are not reviewable upon appeal. Wilmington v. Board of Education, supra; Rental…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Cunningham v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Troy & North Carolina Gold Mining Co. v. Snow Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Bernard v. Shemwell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Ins. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co. Virginia Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. Davis v. RadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API