Drake v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
That the defendant Geary was an independent contractor is one of the defenses on which the city of Asheville relies, and if this defense is established, the merits of others which are claimed to be available will not be discussed. This Court has often applied the doctrine, subject, of course, to certain exceptions, that for the actionable negligence of an independent contractor, the person for whom the work is done cannot be made to respond in damages. Craft v. Timber Co., 132 N. C., 152, 158; Denny v. Burlington, 155 N. C., 33; Greer v. Con struction Co., 190 N. C., 632, 635. It bas…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. Fosburg Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Denny v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Aderholt v. . CondonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Beal v. Champion Fiber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Cole v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Evans v. . Rockingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Richardson v. Greensboro Warehouse & Storage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.