Kenney v. Hood
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit brought under Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942,1 as amended, was for three times the amount claimed as an overcharge on the sale of a refrigerator.
The defense in general was a denial that defendant had sold the refrigerator as alleged by plaintiff. In detail it was that he had agreed to sell the equipment to plaintiff provided there was no ceiling price; that plaintiff, after ascertaining that there was a ceiling price, without advising defendant that there was, paid the agreed price and took the refrigerator for the purpose of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Shearer v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. MauleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Elmers v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- East v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. MurtaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- West v. WinstonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948