Legal Opinion
Elmers v. Shapiro
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1949No. Civ. 13902PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiffs, Harry B. Elmers and his mother Margaret Elmers, purchased a duplex dwelling located on Woodside Way, in San Mateo. This building had been constructed with priority materials secured under federal permits, and, pursuant to federal legislation, the proper federal agency had placed a ceiling price of $13,700 upon it. Plaintiffs purchased the duplex for $8,000 in cash and a five-room house owned by them on Laurel Avenue in Burlingame. This house was valued in the deal at $5,700, but, as an integral part of the transaction, was sold for $11,250. After the transaction was closed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Porter v. MauleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Shearer v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Zwang v. A. & P. Food StoresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Cohen v. MAYFLOWER COPR.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Messick v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.