Legal Opinion

Porter v. Maule

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1947No. 11753PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit, brought by Chester Bowles, as Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, was for an injunction and for treble damages. The claim was that the defendants were making and selling concrete building blocks, 8x8x16, at prices in excess of ceiling prices. The defense in general was a denial that the price regulations invoked were applicable to the blocks defendants were selling. In detail it was that their blocks were different from the Grade “B” blocks covered by the regulation. Instead of blocks having a compressive strength of 700 pounds per square…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. The SapphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Glenn v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. United States v. SeigelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Fleming v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  5. Elmers v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API