Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Hasting

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1944No. 11129PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant sued appellee in the District Court for an injunction and for damages because of violations of price orders and regulations, under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 33, 50 U.S.C. A.Appendix, § 925. The court found that between November 19, 1943, and January 31, 1944, sales of southern pine lumber were made, not for use or consumption by the buyer, in which excess prices were charged in violation of price orders and regulations in an amount of $3,342.65; but that the violations were not wilful. An injunction was granted but damages were denied.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowles v. American Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Bowles v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. United States Ex Rel. Porter v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  5. Porter v. MauleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API