Legal Opinion

United States v. Murtaugh

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1951No. 6270_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by the United States to require the defendants in the District Court to make restitution to the purchasers of certain houses and lots of the excess amount paid by them over and above the maximum sales price established under Priorities Regulation 33 (11 F.R. 601, 4085) passed under the Veterans’ Emergency Housing Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 207, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1821 et seq. It is unlawful under Section 5 of the Act for any person as principal or broker to effect such a sale and the Housing Expediter is authorized by Section 7(a) of the Act, whenever…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ebeling v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. United States v. GrublCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Keele v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  5. Kenney v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. M. G. M. Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
  2. United States v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
  3. Metal Trades, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  4. Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. MillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  5. Oruch v. Lipton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API