Legal Opinion

San Francisco Gas Light Co. v. Dunn

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1882No. 7,473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application for writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

The clause of the contract between the City and County of San Francisco and plaintiff, of May [19] 24,1869, necessary to be recited, reads: “Upon the expiration of the term of five years, hereinbefore limited, the party of the first part (unless it shall elect and notify the party of the second part of its election to advertise for proposals as hereinafter- provided) shall purchase and take from the party of the second part all the gas required for lighting said city as aforesaid for another term of five years, dating from the expiration of the term hereinbefore limited, and…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McNeil v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API