Legal Opinion

Broadbent Land Co. v. Town of Manila

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1992No. 910262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiff Broadbent Land Company appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the town of Manila and Daggett County (collectively “defendants”). Manila installed an underground sewage line along a public highway that crossed Broadbent’s property. Broadbent had purchased the property, subject to the easement for the public highway, and Daggett County, holder of that easement, had granted Manila permission to position the sewer line under the shoulder of the road, within the boundaries of the easement. After the installation of the sewage line, Broadbent sued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Amerada Hess Corp. v. AdeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Pickett v. California Pacific UtilitiesUtah Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bogart v. CapRock Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API