Legal Opinion

Pickett v. California Pacific Utilities

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1980No. 16627PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals a judgment of no cause of action, in which the trial court dismissed his complaint with prejudice after a trial on the merits. The judgment is affirmed. All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended.

Plaintiff initiated this action seeking damages from California Pacific Utilities, hereinafter identified as Cal-Pac, for a permanent utility easement established across plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff further challenged the authority of Iron County to grant a franchise to a public utility to use the public right-of-way in a highway, where…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. McBride v. McBrideUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bolinger v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Road Com'n of Utah v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keokuk Junction Railway Co. v. IES Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Bogart v. CapRock Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Bentel v. County of BannockIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Nerbonne v. Florida Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API