Legal Opinion
Bogart v. CapRock Communications Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 8, 2003No. 97,349PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
1 The only issue presented 1 is whether a landowner is entitled to additional compensation when fiber optic cables are installed within the confines of a public right of way or easement on which public highways or roads are established. We hold that under the facts presented, no additional compensation is warranted.
FACTS
12 This cause concerns a class action lawsuit 2 brought by the appellant, James A. Bogart (Bogart/landowner), the owner of real property in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma, against the appellee, CapRock (Ca-pRoek/telecommunications company), a Texas telecommunications 3 corporation.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Gaines v. COMANCHE COUNTY MEDICAL HOSPITAL & NURSEFINDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.