Legal Opinion

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Adee

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1987No. 8393PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

Defendants appeal from an order of summary judgment rendered against them. They raise four issues: 1) whether the State Highway Department exceeded the contractual limits of its easement on defendants’ land by allowing plaintiff to lay a gas pipeline; 2) whether the laying of the pipeline by plaintiff created an impermissible additional burden upon the servient estates owned by defendants; 3) whether the law allows imposition of a gas pipeline by a private company not operating as a public utility; and 4) whether plaintiff may exercise the power of eminent domain. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. McHorseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Stoll v. DowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Bentel v. County of BannockIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sanchez v. Siemens Transmission SystemsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Faber v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Weber v. Department of Motor VehiclesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Broadbent Land Co. v. Town of ManilaUtah Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API