Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Normandie Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1930No. Docket No. 7635PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued as assignee of six promissory notes executed by the defendant corporation. The cause was tried without a jury and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff as prayed. The appellants are all preferred stockholders of the' defendant corporation who intervened and who appeal from the judgment on typewritten transcripts.

Karl Elliott, Kathryn Elliott, his wife, and one Bowman, his grandfather, composed the board of directors of the Normandie Corporation. The notes in suit were executed by the officers of the corporation by authorization of the board of directors in consideration of money…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Etienne v. KendallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schnittger v. Old Home Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Elliott v. Normandie CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bellaire Securities Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Navigators Specialty Insurance Co. v. Moorefield Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Waring v. PitcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Correia v. CorreiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Elliott v. Normandie CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API