Commonwealth v. Watts
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
The defendant was tried on an indictment charging fornication and bastardy. The prosecutrix testified that she had intercourse with defendant three times, the .last time being sometime in September, 1953. The *400child was born Angnst 6, 1954. Defendant was found guilty, an order of support was entered, and defendant has appealed.
Appellant’s primary contention is that the medical testimony was insufficient to sustain the conviction. The medical testimony was given by the doctor who delivered the child. She testified that the normal gestation period is nine months or 282…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. JodlowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. RexSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. DiCarloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. BlankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by15 opinions
- Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. HarbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. GromoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. HarbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. SoudaniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.