Legal Opinion

Matthew Scott Worley v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2017No. S-15-0114; S-16-0082; S-16-0083PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUTZ, Justice.

[¶1] A jury convicted Matthew Scott Worley of one count of first-degree sexual assault and one count of battery of a household member. 1 On appeal, Mr. Worley claims he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the prosecutor failed to disclose information as required by Brady v. Maryland, 371 U.S. 812, 83 S.Ct. 56, 9 L.Ed.2d 54 (1962) and the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the battery conviction. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Mr. Worley presents the following issues on appeal:

I. Was trial counsel for [Mr. Worley] ineffective when he failed to challenge the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Danell Blevins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Sean Wayne Weston v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API