Matthew Scott Worley v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAUTZ, Justice.
[¶1] A jury convicted Matthew Scott Worley of one count of first-degree sexual assault and one count of battery of a household member. 1 On appeal, Mr. Worley claims he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the prosecutor failed to disclose information as required by Brady v. Maryland, 371 U.S. 812, 83 S.Ct. 56, 9 L.Ed.2d 54 (1962) and the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the battery conviction. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Mr. Worley presents the following issues on appeal:
I. Was trial counsel for [Mr. Worley] ineffective when he failed to challenge the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Danell Blevins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Sean Wayne Weston v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.