Legal Opinion

McKoy v. North Carolina

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1990No. 88-5909PublishedCited by 967 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

In this case we address the constitutionality of the unanimity requirement in North Carolina’s capital sentencing scheme. That requirement prevents the jury from considering, in deciding whether to impose the death penalty, any mitigating factor that the jury does not unanimously find. We hold that under our decision in Mills v. Maryland, 486 U. S. 367 (1988), North Carolina’s unanimity requirement violates the Constitution by preventing the sentencer from considering all mitigating evidence. We therefore vacate petitioner’s death sentence and remand for resentencing.

I

Petitioner Dock McKoy,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by967 opinions

  1. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Miller v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

962 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API