Danell Blevins v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAUTZ, Justice.
[¶1] A jury convicted Appellant Danell Blevins of felony exploitation of a vulnerable adult, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 6-2-507(a) and (d) (LexisNexis 2015). On appeal, Ms. Blevins challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s conclusion that the victim, Richard Tefertiller, was a vulnerable adult. She also claims the district court improperly instructed the jury on the mental element of the crime.
[¶2] We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶3] Ms. Blevins presents the following issues on appeal:
I. Did the State present sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rodriguez v. CaseyWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Derek Earl Hill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Hathaway v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Sean Wayne Weston v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.