Legal Opinion

Revis v. Slocomb Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 19, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-25 MMSPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

Defendant, Slocomb Industries, has moved for summary judgment in this civil rights ease. The plaintiff, Marilyn Revis, has claimed discrimination in promotion under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988) and under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(2) (1988). Docket Item (D.I.) 4. She has also alleged Title VII violations of retaliatory discharge and racial harassment at Slocomb Industries. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1988). 1 This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 (1988).

For the reasons which follow, the defendant’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Rogan v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Blozis v. Mellon Trust of Delaware National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  4. Lewis v. State of Del. Dept. of Public InstructionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
  5. Schlifke v. Trans World Entertainment Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API