Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Hore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1945No. Nos. 33,843, 33,938PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
There are two appeals in this case, one from the order denying appellant’s motion below for a new trial and the other from the judgment. Motions have been made to dismiss both appeals.
In No. 33,843, the appeal is from the order denying the motion for a new trial. The motion to dismiss the appeal is upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion, because more than 30 days after notice of the filing of the decision had elapsed before the motion was heard, and the time for hearing it had not been extended by written stipulation of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Noonan v. SpearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. H. M. Brown Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Harcum v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- McCusker v. SpierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Harrington v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State Personnel Commission v. HowardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.