Legal Opinion

Cox v. Selover

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1925No. 25,162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

In denying the petition for a reargument, we take occasion to say that the refusal to grant the application for a writ of certiorari does not stand in the way of an application to the district court for an order vacating and setting aside the order granting a new trial, for it would be the duty of that court to grant such an application if it be a fact that the motion for a new trial was heard more than 30 days after the coming in of the verdict, without an extension of the time by written stipulation of the parties or by the court for cause. The power of the court to vacate its orders cannot…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weiser v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. County of Itasca v. RalphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API