Legal Opinion
State v. Walker
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 2014No. CC 091089; CA A142712; SC S060828PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
The issue in this case is what constitutes an “enterprise” within the meaning of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 -166.735. Defendant was charged in Clatsop County with one count of racketeering, ORS 166.720(3), and one count of theft in the first degree, ORS 164.055. The racketeering count, which required proof that defendant participated in an “enterprise” through a pattern of racketeering, was based on the charged theft offense and two uncharged offenses of theft in the second degree allegedly committed in another county. A jury found…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.