Legal Opinion

Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2014No. WCB 0900126SH; CA A147558; SC S061183PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

ORS 654.086(2) provides that an employer is not liable for a “serious” violation of the Oregon Safe Employment Act (OSEA) if “the employer did not, and could not with the exercise of reasonable diligence, know of the presence of the violation.” At issue in this case is what the statute means when it says that an employer “could not with the exercise of reasonable diligence know” of a violation. The Court of Appeals held that the statutory phrase refers not to whether an employer “could” know — in the sense of being capable of knowing — of the violation; rather, the phrase refers to whether,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. HubbellOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API