Legal Opinion

Pryor v. Chambersburg Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1954No. Appeals, 16 and 17PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiffs instituted this action in trespass against the Chambersburg Oil and Gas Company, the local distributor in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania of Tvdol petroleum products, to recover damages caused by a gasoline explosion in a filling station operated by the plaintiffs, as executors and trustees under the will of Albert R. Pryor. The original defendant brought in Charles A. Pryor and Ralph Pauli as additional defendants. They were respectively the manager of this local filling station and the general manager of the several places of business conducted by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Voitasefski v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Fredericks v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Takac v. BamfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Speyer, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Keefer v. ByersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Hennigan v. Atlantic Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API