Legal Opinion

Voitasefski v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1949No. Appeals, 142 to 145PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial in actions of trespass for injuries resulting from a collision between the automobile in which the appellees were riding and a street car. Ver diets were rendered for the plaintiffs, in the sum of $16,944.53 for Constantine Voitasefski, $2,500 for Clara Voitasefski, $15,000 for Evelyn Voitasefski, and $15,000 for Laura Voitasefski Ruschak. The first named plaintiffs are husband and wife; the other plaintiffs are their daughters. All of them were in an automobile driven by Constantine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Von Der Heide v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API