Legal Opinion

Downriver Plaza Group v. Southgate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1994No. 95019, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, C.J.

Plaintiffs, property owners in the City of Southgate, filed this action against Southgate because the city placed a charge for the operation and maintenance costs of the Southgate-Wyandotte Drainage District (swdd) on their 1987 and 1988 tax bills. Plaintiffs allege that the charges were illegal, and seek recovery of monies paid. The trial court ruled that the fees were valid, and denied recovery. The Court of Appeals re*658versed,1 and ordered Southgate to refund an estimated $1.7 million in collected fees. We granted leave in this case to resolve the following issues: (1) whether Southgate had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Romein v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lafontaine Saline, Inc v. Chrysler Group LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Pontiac Police & Fire Retiree Prefunded Group Health & Insurance Trust Board of Trustees v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Board of Trustees of the City of Pontiac v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Board of Trustees of the City of Pontiac v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API