Lafontaine Saline, Inc v. Chrysler Group LLC
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
This case concerns whether the 2010 amendment of the Motor Vehicle Dealer Act (MVDA), 1 expanding the relevant market area — the area within which automobile manufacturers are required to notify an existing dealership of the manufacturer’s intent to establish a dealership selling the same line of vehicles as that existing dealership — from a six-mile radius to a nine-mile radius, applies retroactively. We conclude that it does not. The 2010 amendment of the MVDA contains no language suggesting retroactivity, and applying the amendment retroactively would alter the parties’ existing contract…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McNEILL-MARKS v. MIDMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER-GRATIOTMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Diem v. Sallie Mae Home Loans, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Perlin v. Time Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Moeller v. American Media, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.