Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The question presented by these cases is whether application of the withdrawal liability provisions of the Multi- employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 to employers withdrawing from pension plans during a 5-month period prior to the statute’s enactment violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We hold that it does not.
I — I
<C
In 1974, after careful study of private retirement pension plans, Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. Among the principal purposes of this “comprehensive and reticulated…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by888 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
883 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.