Legal Opinion

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1984No. 83-245PublishedCited by 888 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The question presented by these cases is whether application of the withdrawal liability provisions of the Multi- employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 to employers withdrawing from pension plans during a 5-month period prior to the statute’s enactment violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We hold that it does not.

I — I

<C

In 1974, after careful study of private retirement pension plans, Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. Among the principal purposes of this “comprehensive and reticulated…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by888 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

883 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API