State v. Mayhood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
In these two cases, which we decide together, the state appeals from pretrial orders of the Itasca County District Court dismissing for lack of probable cause prosecutions against two separate defendants for the offense of intentional damage to property, Minn. St. 609.595, subd. (3)- 1 In each case the property damaged was property owned by the defendant’s wife. In the Cris-man case the parties apparently were not separated at the time, whereas in Mayhood the parties were separated but not under any judicial decree. The issue raised on appeal in both cases is whether the district court erred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of St. Paul v. LandrevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- City of St. Paul v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Jorgenson v. Girard Fire Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. AarsvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Wild v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. GianakosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.