Legal Opinion
City of St. Paul v. Hurd
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 1974No. 44180PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul dismissing with prejudice the charge against the defendant under St. Paul Legislative Code, § 425.03. We dismiss this appeal.
The facts relevant to this appeal are not in dispute. The defendant, Charles Emmett Hurd, was arrested for possession of a firearm in violation of the above ordinance which provides in part:
“No person shall carry on his person, or have in his possession or control in any public place, any firearm, except as provided in Section 425.05 and except the following persons:
A. Peace Officers.
B. Military…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Douglass v. AytchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- State v. MakiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. SommersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WingoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- City of St. Paul v. LandrevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. RuizIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- City of St. Paul v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. MayhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.