Consolidated Home Supply Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. New Loveland & Greeley Irrigation & Land Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the District Court of Boulder County.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell
This action was brought by defendant in error, plaintiff below, to restrain the plaintiff in error, defendant below, and the water commissioner in water district No. 4, from interfering with the plaintiff’s use of water for the purposes of irrigation. The plaintiff pleaded, as the evidence of its right, a decree of the district court of Boulder county rendered in 1883 in the statutory proceedings for determining the priorities of right to use water for purposes of irrigation in the water district in which the ditches are situate, by which its several priorities were determined to be superior…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Montrose Canal Co. v. Loutsenhizer Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Boulder & Weld County Ditch Co. v. Lower Boulder Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Handy Ditch Co. v. South Side Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of Lee v. GraberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Weiland v. Reorganized Catlin Consolidated Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Field v. KincaidSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Hinderlider v. Town of BerthoudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.