Weiland v. Reorganized Catlin Consolidated Canal Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Otero District Court. Hon. C. S. Essex, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtGabbert, C. J.
*126The Reorganized Catlin Consolidated Canal Company commenced an action in the District Court of Otero County,, against the State Engineer, the Division Engineer of Irrigation Division No. 2, and the Water Commissioner of Water-District No. 17. No other parties were made defendants.
In the complaint, after alleging the official duties of the-defendants, it was stated that plaintiff owned specified priorities to the use of water from the Arkansas river, diverted1 by means of the Catlin Canal, having its headgate in Water District No. 17; that these priorities were dated September 3, 1884, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Medano Ditch Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co. v. Farmers' Independent Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Kerr v. BurnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Boulder & Left Hand Ditch Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. SheriffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Faden v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Bijou Irrigation District v. Weldon Valley Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- El Paso & R. I. Ry. Co. v. District Court of Fifth Judicial DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Farmers' Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Boyd Lake Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.